From: abdul_rahim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon Sep 25 2000 - 17:54:11 GMT-3
I dont think it would work Mark as the network 172.16.1.0 the serial
Interface is already a part of 172.16.0.0 so adding a redistribute
coonnected command wouldnt help in this scenario
I can't think of some thing to prevent this from happening but I bet a very
ugly way would be there only yo prevent this
Thanks
Abdul Rahim
"Mark Lewis" <markl11@hotmail.com>@groupstudy.com on 09/25/2000 01:42:12 PM
Please respond to "Mark Lewis" <markl11@hotmail.com>
Sent by: nobody@groupstudy.com
To: rupawala@SOLUTIONS.ATT.com
ccielab@groupstudy.com
cc:
Subject: Re: EIGRP and OSPF redistribution.
Hi,
Haven't got a router in front of me, so I don't know if this will work, but
here goes:
First, check the EIGRP topology table of the other router. I think that the
net. for s0 won't be in it. It hasn't been redist.ed (from OSPF)because
it's
directly connected.
So, redist. connected into EIGRP, and use a route-map to filter just s0
(you
don't want all connected int.s). Is another route to s0 now in the topology
table? Should be.
You can now use admin dist. to choose the route you want.
Does that work? Let me know...
Hope that helps,
Mark
>From: "Rupawala, Honeid" <rupawala@SOLUTIONS.ATT.com>
>Reply-To: "Rupawala, Honeid" <rupawala@SOLUTIONS.ATT.com>
>To: "'ccielab@groupstudy.com'" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: EIGRP and OSPF redistribution.
>Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 15:46:28 -0400
>
>Hi team,
>
>Pls. provide your feedback on this.
>
>Assume I have a ASBR in OSPF running EIGRP with the outside domain. This
>router has say 2 interfaces, s0 and eth0. s0 lies in OSPF area 0 and e0 is
>on EIGRP.
>
>Also both these segments are on different subnets, but of the same major
>network. For eg., s0 has ip add of 172.16.1.1 /24 and e0 has ip add of
>172.16.2.1/24.
>
>Now if I run EIGRP , the s0 interface will also have EIGRP running, since
>the network statement under the EIGRP process truncates to a classful
>network.
>
>When redistributing OSPF into EIGRP, all OSPF networks except that of s0
>will appear as D EX routes to downstream EIGRP routers. The s0 network
will
>appear to be
>a D ( ie an internal network ). How can I avoid this ? I want that the s0
>net should appear as D EX.
>
>I tried increasing the AD of D routes from 90 to 180 but didn,t work.
>
>Regards
>
>Honeid.
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:02 GMT-3