Re: Redistributing OSPF to IGRP

From: Tony Olzak (aolzak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Sep 25 2000 - 11:34:34 GMT-3


   
   Lei,
   
   When you enter in the the command "summary-address 172.17.59.0
   255.255.255.192" it creates an OSPF route on Router 1 (the ASBR) that
   says route 172.17.59.0/26 to Null0. That's OK because you have more
   exact routes to your real networks. This route is redistributed into
   IGRP and sent to Router 2 in the update.
   
   Send me your config, maybe you just missed something else.
   
   Tony
   
   ----- Original Message -----
   
   From: Lei Chen
   
   To: Tony Olzak
   
   Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 1:55 AM
   
   Subject: Re: Redistributing OSPF to IGRP
   
   Hi Tony,
   
   
   
   I tried your config on my routers. It's not working. Router2 still
   can't get route to 172.17.59.0/26. Are you sure summary-address does
   this function? It's said in Doyle's book that summary-address only
   summarizes external routes into ospf domain, not summarize ospf routes
   to other routing domains.
   
   
   
   Thanks,
   
   
   
   Lei
   
   ----- Original Message -----
   
   From: Tony Olzak
   
   To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
   
   Sent: Sunday, September 24, 2000 8:49 PM
   
   Subject: Redistributing OSPF to IGRP
   
   All,
   
   
   
   Just wanted to close this topic and share my findings.
   
   
   
   Without using the default-network command or static routes, the only
   way to redistribute OSPF into IGRP with VLSM is to use the
   summary-address command on the OSPF router. This route will be
   redistirbuted into IGRP and allow that router to communicate with the
   other networks. One catch is that this summary address must have the
   same mask as the IGRP link that is enabled on that major network.
   Example:
   
   
   
   Router 1
   
   !
   
   interface Loopback1
    ip address 172.17.59.1 255.255.255.248
   !
   interface Loopback2
    ip address 172.17.59.17 255.255.255.240
   !
   interface Loopback3
    ip address 172.17.59.33 255.255.255.224
   !
   
   interface Serial1
    ip address 172.17.59.129 255.255.255.192
   
   !
   
   router ospf 100
    summary-address 172.17.59.0 255.255.255.192
    redistribute igrp 100 metric 64 subnets
    passive-interface Serial1
    network 172.17.59.0 0.0.0.7 area 0
    network 172.17.59.16 0.0.0.15 area 1
    network 172.17.59.32 0.0.0.31 area 2
   
   !
   
   router igrp 100
    redistribute ospf 100 metric 64 10 255 1 1500
    passive-interface Loopback1
    passive-interface Loopback2
    passive-interface Loopback3
    network 172.17.0.0
   !
   ip classless
   
   
   
   
   
   Router 2
   
   !
   
   interface Ethernet0
    ip address 10.0.0.1 255.0.0.0
    !
   interface Serial0
    ip address 172.17.59.130 255.255.255.192
    clockrate 64000
   
   !
   
   router igrp 100
    network 10.0.0.0
    network 172.17.0.0
   !
   ip classless
   
   
   
   Router 1 and 2 are connected through their serial interfaces. The mask
   on this connection is /26, so the summary on Router 1 must have a mask
   of /26 also or it will not redistribute to router 2. At first I tried
   a summary of 172.17.0.0 255.255.0.0 thinking that since IGRP only
   understood classful networks that the summary address would have to be
   a class B standard mask. The route did not make it to Router 2. After
   skimming through Doyle's book, it reminded me how since the 172.17.0.0
   network on router 2 had a mask of /26, only matching subnet masks
   would redistribute from router 1.
   
   
   
   Tony
   
   



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:02 GMT-3