From: Kevin Baumgartner (kbaumgar@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Sep 21 2000 - 23:39:04 GMT-3
Why do you think this is a Cisco internal site?
All it says is that it's a "site dedicated to the advancement
of computer systems professionals within Cisco partners and
resellers". Why can't this be a private company that provides
training to Cisco partners? It may or may not have any relationship
with Cisco. And Cisco may or may not certify this training
with this company.
I could create my own company and also say that my company
provides professional training for Cisco partners and resellers.
Does that mean Cisco certified this? Again maybe but maybe not.
I am not say that this company is not certified with Cisco.
I don't know. There are a lot of companies that seems to be
getting into training and certification. Some very good and
some questionable.
Kevin
>
> wow! what a site - wish I had something like this to practice on before going
for my test!
>
> And they give you the lab setup for free.... Hope cciebootcamp is looking at
this site ;)
>
> And this is from Cisco themselves.
>
> Wow! words escape me!
> kaushik
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Burgstaller, Oliver [SMTP:BurgstallerO@messe-duesseldorf.de]
> Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 2:50 AM
> To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> Subject: WG: NDA violations with this group- OK
>
> Sorry, last topic on NDA
>
> see this web side http://www.midwestlabs.net/ and the LABS this is against
> NDA because now all of us know now 80% of the CCIE LABS and it is from CISCO
> SYSTEM internal. So now think about all the CNE and CCIE in this world.
>
> Oliver
>
> -----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Vito Trimlett [mailto:Vito.Trimlett@callisma.com]
> Gesendet am: Mittwoch, 20. September 2000 22:59
> An: Kevin Baumgartner; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Betreff: Re: NDA violations with this group- OK
>
> With all due respect to everyone, can we move on. There are enough e-mails
> to sift through on technology nevermind protocol and semantics on this
> subject. So can we get back on track.
>
> Yours truly,
> Vito
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Kevin Baumgartner <kbaumgar@cisco.com>
> To: ccnp today <ccnp_to_be@yahoo.com>
> Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 4:35 PM
> Subject: Re: NDA violations with this group
>
>
> > Not all of us that are complaining about NDA are CCIE's!
> >
> > I don't agree with you that what does it matter if someone
> > lets this stuff out. Your response is that if this gets out
> > it won't help passing the test anyway. Well if that's the
> > case why give out this too begin with.
> >
> > Kevin
> >
> > At 12:27 PM 9/20/00 -0700, you wrote:
> > >Why is it some of you CCIEs only get involved in this
> > >group to preach to us about the NDA? From my own
> > >personal experience with some recent CCIEs, they don't
> > >seem to care that much about violating the NDA policy
> > >BEFORE they take the test (and I can point to several
> > >who shared their previous labs with me) but boy does
> > >their opinion change once they get their cert! Then it
> > >was only by their hard work and dedication they
> > >passed. Not that I don't understand it, that's
> > >probably how I'll act too! I just can't stomach the
> > >whining! As if telling someone that multicasting will
> > >be on the exam will help them pass, give me a break.
> > >Feel free to flame!
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:00 GMT-3