From: Vito Trimlett (Vito.Trimlett@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Sep 20 2000 - 17:59:22 GMT-3
With all due respect to everyone, can we move on. There are enough e-mails
to sift through on technology nevermind protocol and semantics on this
subject. So can we get back on track.
Yours truly,
Vito
----- Original Message -----
From: Kevin Baumgartner <kbaumgar@cisco.com>
To: ccnp today <ccnp_to_be@yahoo.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 4:35 PM
Subject: Re: NDA violations with this group
> Not all of us that are complaining about NDA are CCIE's!
>
> I don't agree with you that what does it matter if someone
> lets this stuff out. Your response is that if this gets out
> it won't help passing the test anyway. Well if that's the
> case why give out this too begin with.
>
> Kevin
>
> At 12:27 PM 9/20/00 -0700, you wrote:
> >Why is it some of you CCIEs only get involved in this
> >group to preach to us about the NDA? From my own
> >personal experience with some recent CCIEs, they don't
> >seem to care that much about violating the NDA policy
> >BEFORE they take the test (and I can point to several
> >who shared their previous labs with me) but boy does
> >their opinion change once they get their cert! Then it
> >was only by their hard work and dedication they
> >passed. Not that I don't understand it, that's
> >probably how I'll act too! I just can't stomach the
> >whining! As if telling someone that multicasting will
> >be on the exam will help them pass, give me a break.
> >Feel free to flame!
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:24:59 GMT-3