From: Bill O'Brien (wjobrien_99@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Sep 21 2000 - 11:24:34 GMT-3
Tony,
I usually us the additonal statements on the
redistribute ospf 100 internal external 1 external 2
then the metric.
Bill
--- Tom Rice <tom.rice@usa.net> wrote:
> Tony,
> Try using the summary-address command under ospf
> assigning the prefix to the
> mask as your link to your igrp router.
>
> If you summarize the routes to the same mask as the
> igrp link they should
> pass.
>
>
> Tom Rice
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Mary Weidner
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 3:18 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Redistributing OSPF into IGRP
>
>
> All,
>
> I am working on a practice lab on one of the midwest
> channels racks and am
> having a problem with redistribution. Here's a
> sample config:
>
> Router A
> !
> router ospf 100
> network 172.17.59.32 0.0.0.15 area 0
> network 172.17.59.48 0.0.0.15 area 2
> network 172.17.59.64 0.0.0.63 area 3
> redistribute igrp 100 metric 64 subnets
> !
> router igrp 100
> network 172.17.0.0
> redistribute ospf 100 metric 64 10 255 1 1500
>
>
>
> Router B
> !
> router igrp 100
> network 172.17.0.0
> !
>
> Here's the deal, IGRP does not understand VLSM which
> is what is being used
> on router A with OSPF. From all the docs I've read,
> you would have to put in
> static routes on Router B to tell it how to get to
> those other subnets,
> except I'm not allowed to use static routes. The
> subnets in OSPF on Router A
> are not redistributing into IGRP. They come out as
> 172.17.0.0 instead of
> whatever the real network number is.
>
> Here's the other thing I tried; I added these lines:
>
> Router A
> !
> router ospf 100
> default-information originate always
> !
> router igrp 100
> default-information allowed in 1
> default-information allowed out 1
> !
> access-list 1 permit any
>
> Router B
> !
> router igrp 100
> default-information allowed in 1
> !
> access-list 1 permit any
>
> The thinking here was to originate a default route
> (0.0.0.0) from Router A
> in OSPF and try to redistribute this into IGRP.....
> it didn't work. Maybe I
> just configured it wrong or maybe it's just not
> possible. I don't know. This
> is the second time I've attempted to get this
> working to no avail. Let me
> know if you have any ideas.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tony Olzak
>
> BTW-I've just joined the list. I'm scheduled to take
> the test on Nov 19-20
> in RTP.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:24:59 GMT-3