Re: Redistributing OSPF into IGRP

From: Dayong Gan (dygan@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Sep 21 2000 - 11:42:08 GMT-3


   
summary-address 172.17.0.0/24 will work too. This
command on router A OSPF process only works when this
ospf router is a ASBR. which means if there is no
"redistribute xxx" command under ospf process, this
command does not work. This command will add an ospf
summary route point to null0 on router A. and this
route can be redistributed to igrp with the command
redistribute ospf under igrp process.

IGRP does not use 0.0.0.0 as the default route. The
default-information in/out command under igrp process
permit or deny the default route generated by "ip
default-network" command.

Dayong

--- Daniel Keller <DMKeller@comdisco.com> wrote:
> Tony,
>
> The only way to do this without adding static routes
> is to add a default-network command at router A.
> The things to remember in doing this is that the
> default network must point to a route that router A
> knows about and you must keep it classfull. For
> instande, say that router A also knows about network
> 10.1.1.0/24. Then, to send a default to router B
> you need to configure "ip default-network 10.0.0.0"
> glabally in router A. If you made the mistake of
> putting "ip default-network 10.1.1.0" in the router,
> you will see that a static route will be inserted
> into the config automatically, and you said that
> static routes are not allowed.
>
> Oh yes, one last thing. Make sure that router B has
> "ip classless" configured also in order to make this
> work. Everyone else, if I am wrong in any way or if
> I forget something, please add to this.
>
> I will also be in RTP on Nov. 20 taking my lab test.
> See you then!
>
> Dan Keller
>
>
> >>> "Mary Weidner" <aolzak@buckeye-express.com>
> 09/20/00 02:17PM >>>
> All,
>
> I am working on a practice lab on one of the midwest
> channels racks and am having a problem with
> redistribution. Here's a sample config:
>
> Router A
> !
> router ospf 100
> network 172.17.59.32 0.0.0.15 area 0
> network 172.17.59.48 0.0.0.15 area 2
> network 172.17.59.64 0.0.0.63 area 3
> redistribute igrp 100 metric 64 subnets
> !
> router igrp 100
> network 172.17.0.0
> redistribute ospf 100 metric 64 10 255 1 1500
>
>
>
> Router B
> !
> router igrp 100
> network 172.17.0.0
> !
>
> Here's the deal, IGRP does not understand VLSM which
> is what is being used on router A with OSPF. From
> all the docs I've read, you would have to put in
> static routes on Router B to tell it how to get to
> those other subnets, except I'm not allowed to use
> static routes. The subnets in OSPF on Router A are
> not redistributing into IGRP. They come out as
> 172.17.0.0 instead of whatever the real network
> number is.
>
> Here's the other thing I tried; I added these lines:
>
>
> Router A
> !
> router ospf 100
> default-information originate always
> !
> router igrp 100
> default-information allowed in 1
> default-information allowed out 1
> !
> access-list 1 permit any
>
> Router B
> !
> router igrp 100
> default-information allowed in 1
> !
> access-list 1 permit any
>
> The thinking here was to originate a default route
> (0.0.0.0) from Router A in OSPF and try to
> redistribute this into IGRP..... it didn't work.
> Maybe I just configured it wrong or maybe it's just
> not possible. I don't know. This is the second time
> I've attempted to get this working to no avail. Let
> me know if you have any ideas.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tony Olzak
>
> BTW-I've just joined the list. I'm scheduled to take
> the test on Nov 19-20 in RTP.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:24:59 GMT-3