From: Omar Baceski (obaceski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Sep 20 2000 - 15:53:59 GMT-3
are you planning to redistribute BGP into ospf. think again...it will kill
your routers every time a neighbor (or anyone on the internet) take down one
of his routers. Just use BGP al the way down. by the way. IBGP runs on port
tcp 179, so the pix config is very straightforward.
i hope it helps...
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: Vito Trimlett [SMTP:Vito.Trimlett@callisma.com]
> Enviado el: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 3:15 PM
> Para: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Asunto: bgp private as with legal as
>
> I have a design question.
>
> * If you have 2 WAN links to the Internet. Each WAN link is going to
> a different provider.
> * Each WAN link is on its own router (7206). Running EBGP from the
> legal AS configured edge/asbr routers to the providers and running OSPF
> and IBGP between the ASBRs and 2 more internal routers.
> * The 2 internal routers will then each have a connection to a PIX FW.
> Connected to the PIXes on the inside are 2 6509's.
>
> Now here is my question. My initial design idea was to run OSPF (Neighbor
> NBMA) between the internal routers and the 6509's and obviously through
> the PIX.
> Would it be better to configure a private BGP AS on the 6509s and run EBGP
> multihop to the internal routers through the PIX? I know that in Halabi's
> book he mentions that it is a illegal design to advertise a private AS
> along with a Legal AS to an ISP. If anyone has experience with this please
> let me know.
>
> Vito Trimlett
> CCIE LAB scheduled DEC 19TH Raleigh
>
> . ----- Original Message -----
> From: Bill O'Brien < wjobrien_99@yahoo.com <mailto:wjobrien_99@yahoo.com>>
> To: < ccielab@groupstudy.com <mailto:ccielab@groupstudy.com>>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 1:32 PM
> Subject: Swap R/S Lab Date of 18 Nov 00 for San Jose
>
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I have a Lab date for 18 Nov 00 at San Jose. I'm
> > looking for a date sometime in middle of Oct to
> > Earlier Nov. at any site.
> >
> > So if you think you may need a little more time,
> > please let me know.
> >
> > Bill
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:24:59 GMT-3