From: Elaine B. Lopes (elopes@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Sep 18 2000 - 18:31:52 GMT-3
Hi Kevin,
The troubleshooting part will be in the future (worldwide) like you said: you'l
l have a completely new topology and a binder with how it's supposed to be work
ing plus the 25 points of failure to be worked on. So for now, make sure you ma
ke a good documentation of your topology before going to troubleshooting. Still
, the documentation part will be important for the proctor to grade your work,
since the addressing scheme is up to the candidate, and it's worth points anywa
y for a updated documentation.
Cheers,
Elaine Lopes
At 09:54 AM 09/18/2000 -0700, Kevin Baumgartner wrote:
>That's interesting that this is the way the troubleshooting part is done in Br
azil.
>I am hearing rumors that the troubleshooting (at least in the US) will be a co
mpletely
>different network than you work on for the first 1.5 days. And once you figure
out the
>topology you have to find all the problems that are in the network and solve t
hem.
>This makes the troubleshooting harder I would think since you are not using th
e network
>you designed and worked on for the first 1.5 days. Also completely documenting
your
>network so that you can use in troubleshooting then makes less sense.
>
> But don't take this as truth. At least from me as I haven't yet made it to
the
>troubleshooting section.
>
> Kevin
>
>At 10:14 AM 9/18/00 -0700, you wrote:
> >The lab in Sao Paulo, Brazil is like any other labs worldwide, as statistics
and exams. Regarding the patching, candidates are required to do their own pat
ching according to the exam topology given to them. Troubleshooting for now wor
ks by inserting faults on the topology the candidate just left when he/she leav
es the lab after Day2-morning. Regards,
> >Elaine Lopes
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:24:57 GMT-3