Re: Out of sequence packets

From: damien (damien@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Sep 04 2000 - 13:44:26 GMT-3


   
   Thanks for the replies, I am familiar with all the switching methods
   and how they operate. What I would like to know is more on a practical
   level. of what ratio speed links people have experienced problems with
   out of sequence packets.
   
   So if I have to equal cost routes to the same destination, either by
   manipulating metrics or using variance or whatever, at what different
   ratio's regarding the links speeds can you expect to see problems
   using with fast-switching or process if any.
   
   Variance will only switch per packet assuming you have process
   switching enabled. Otherwise its per destination/ stream. So Variance
   only accomodates route selection.......! forgot about that :~)
   
   Therefore if I have 2 equal cost paths and use fast-switching/ cef
   (without perpacket enabled)....there should be know issues with out of
   sequence as the whole stream is switching via a single speed path ??
   
   ----- Original Message -----
   
   From: Graham Shaw
   
   To: 'damien' ; ccielab@groupstudy.com
   
   Sent: Monday, September 04, 2000 1:09 PM
   
   Subject: RE: Out of sequence packets
   
   Variance is only used to inject unequal cost routes into the routing
   table. As far as per packet of per destination. Depends if you are
   process switching or interrupt context switching. (The path taken
   depends on links.. If you have a route with a metric of 10000 and a
   route with a metric of 20000 then 2 paths will go across the lower
   route and 1 path will go across the upper route.)
   
   
   
   Process switching will (on equal cost links) round robin packet. Fast
   switching will switch packets based on per destination IP address.
   Once the flow is built then it will always use the same outbound
   interface until the cache is invalidated. Cef by defaults operates
   exatly the same as fast switching (but a little faster).. However you
   can have CEF do per packet load balancing on a per-interface basis if
   required.
   
   -----Original Message----
   From: damien [mailto:damien@clara.co.uk]
   Sent: 04 September 2000 15:10
   To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
   Subject: Out of sequence packets
   
   
   
   Has anybody actually seen problems with out of sequence packets in
   real life scenarios. The scenario I am interested in is the typical
   example where there are switch paths to the same destination with one
   link for example 2M and the other 1M? Does anybody have any proof of
   concept testing done in a Lab were they can confirm at what different
   speed ratios you are sure to experience problems based on certain
   types of switching etc? I appreciate that there are a lot of
   variables in this equation, e.g. type of switching, size of traffic
   streams etc, etc. Any information/ experiences would be appreciated.
   
   
   
   Can Variance overcome this issue ? Without reviewing my notes, I can
   not remember whether Variance switches on stream or packet. If it is
   stream. In theory, if a Router is performing stream switching, is it
   fair to say that there should be no out of sequence issues due to the
   fact that the entire stream is following a single path with fixed
   speeds. If per packet switching is in use, they there maybe issues
   with out of sequence packets due to the packets belonging to the same
   stream being switched via different speed links.
   
   
   
   I could go on an on........ :~)



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:24:52 GMT-3