From: Kevin Baumgartner (kbaumgar@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Aug 30 2000 - 23:54:06 GMT-3
Thank you!
I'm getting off this thread also. Really getting tired of
explaining why I would recommend using frame-maps in the "lab test".
Lets move on.
Kevin
>
> Since I started this thread I hope to put it to bed. My sense is that I
> plan to use frame relay map on multipoint sub interfaces and physical
> interfaces considering that time is so short so I do not want to waste
> any troubleshooting non working configs before I actually make it to day
> 2. Also, my sense is unless the number of DLCIs are over 10 per router,
> I should be able to do either interface dlci commands or frame relay
> maps. In a real life environment, I amy rely on inverse ARP.
>
> Nuff said:-)
>
> Kevin Baumgartner wrote:
> >
> > Well the last time I took the lab I asked the proctor if it mattered
> > if I used Inverse-arp or Frame-maps. She said it didn't matter to her.
> > Either one will work for her.
> >
>
>
>
> Mark Salmon
> Project Engineer
> Cisco Professional Services
> Phone:773-695-8235
> Pager:800-365-4578
> email: masalmon@cisco.com
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:24:33 GMT-3