From: Brian Hescock (bhescock@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Aug 30 2000 - 23:41:29 GMT-3
Actually, that's a secure VPN. A plain and simple VPN is just a tunnel,
nothing else. You can blame marketing on that one... ;-)
Brian
On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Derek Buelna wrote:
> Setup IPSec with NAT. Try a LAN to LAN tunnel through an 'Internet Router'.
> Make it so a PC can come in 'through the Internet' and get access to both
> sites through a 'remote access' VPN. If you add a static translation for a
> server at the 'main' site, you have to do something a little tricky in order
> for NAT to work for users accessing the server from the remote site and from
> the Internet.
>
> Have fun!
>
> -Derek
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> John Conzone
> Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 4:08 PM
> To: ccielab
> Subject: What constitutes a "VPN"
>
>
> Anyone have any thoughts on what constitutes a "VPN"as it relates to
> our lab?
> This term means many things to many people as we all know.
> I've been working with the Cisco encryption engine bewteen routers and
> over a GRE tunnel with manual key exchange. I've done some IPSec and IKE,
> but not a whole lot. I'm hoping somewhere in there I can pull out a "VPN".
> What are you guys doing to cover "VPN"?
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:24:33 GMT-3