From: Sheref Mohamed (baltaga_2000@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Aug 26 2000 - 20:13:57 GMT-3
Thanks Eric for your valuable response !
Sheref
--- "Erick B." <erickbe@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> This is the way routing works. The networks are
> directly connected networks to the router so if you
> specify 150.10.0.0 IGRP will announce all the
> 150.10.0.0 networks in the routing table on the
> interfaces where IGRP is active. If you don't want
> this behavior then use filters/distribute lists,
> modify your network statement(s).
>
> It would have worked as you expected if the ethernet
> interfaces weren't 150.10.x.x.
>
> --- Sheref Mohamed <baltaga_2000@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > If you have:
> > e0 to0
> > > R1 (s0)------------(s0) R2 <
> > e1 to1
> >
> > If IGRP is running only on the WAN link and you
> want
> > to make sure that these are the ONLY interfaces
> are
> > advertising IGRP, is it okay to see routes for e0
> > and
> > e1 on R2 coming from R1 !!!
> >
> > R1 addresses:
> > s0: 150.10.1.2/24
> > e0: 150.10.20.1/24
> >
> > The issue here when you define network 150.10.0.0
> > under
> > igrp on R1 it will let R1 send IGRP information
> into
> > R2!, is that's acceptable behaviour !
> >
> > Thanks
> > S.
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:24:30 GMT-3