From: Erick B. (erickbe@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Aug 26 2000 - 14:17:27 GMT-3
This is the way routing works. The networks are
directly connected networks to the router so if you
specify 150.10.0.0 IGRP will announce all the
150.10.0.0 networks in the routing table on the
interfaces where IGRP is active. If you don't want
this behavior then use filters/distribute lists,
modify your network statement(s).
It would have worked as you expected if the ethernet
interfaces weren't 150.10.x.x.
--- Sheref Mohamed <baltaga_2000@yahoo.com> wrote:
> If you have:
> e0 to0
> > R1 (s0)------------(s0) R2 <
> e1 to1
>
> If IGRP is running only on the WAN link and you want
> to make sure that these are the ONLY interfaces are
> advertising IGRP, is it okay to see routes for e0
> and
> e1 on R2 coming from R1 !!!
>
> R1 addresses:
> s0: 150.10.1.2/24
> e0: 150.10.20.1/24
>
> The issue here when you define network 150.10.0.0
> under
> igrp on R1 it will let R1 send IGRP information into
> R2!, is that's acceptable behaviour !
>
> Thanks
> S.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:24:30 GMT-3