From: Earl Aboytes (earl@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Aug 26 2000 - 01:53:39 GMT-3
You can bet that is the version that they use in the lab. I, of course,
don't know that for sure. Know how to do it both ways.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Earl Aboytes CCIE #6097
Senior Technical Consultant
GTE Managed Solutions
805-381-8817
earl.aboytes@verizon.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
damien
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2000 10:01 AM
To: Simon Baxter; CCIE Group Study (E-mail)
Subject: Re: 2nd attempt at a question!!
use the "ip ospf network"...certian IOS restrictions.......as usual.........
----- Original Message -----
From: "Simon Baxter" <Simon.Baxter@au.logical.com>
To: "CCIE Group Study (E-mail)" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2000 1:50 PM
Subject: 2nd attempt at a question!!
> I'm doing a test lab which has asked me if there's any way to advertise
> routes to loopback interfaces as anything but /32 routes.
>
> I can't see any way around this :
>
> Link connected to: a Stub Network
> (Link ID) Network/subnet number: 130.130.33.1
> (Link Data) Network Mask: 255.255.255.255
> Number of TOS metrics: 0
> TOS 0 Metrics: 1
>
> R4#sh ip os int lo0
> Loopback0 is up, line protocol is up
> Internet Address 130.130.33.1/24, Area 0.0.0.0
> Process ID 10, Router ID 130.130.33.1, Network Type LOOPBACK, Cost: 1
> Loopback interface is treated as a stub Host
> R4#
>
>
> No matter what I do, it always stays as "Loopback interface is treated as
a
> stub Host"
>
>
> Is this a trick question???
>
> I'm losing WAY too much sleep over it..
>
>
> Simon
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:24:30 GMT-3