sh ip ospf interface async1 -- No Hellos (Passive interface)

From: Alejandro Cadarso (a.cadarso@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Aug 24 2000 - 15:50:45 GMT-3


   
Hi

I'm trying to make a lab about OSPF, and I'm using a dedicated
connection between two routers with Async interfaces, emulating a leased
line:

interface Async1
 ip address 192.19.18.1 255.255.255.0
 no ip directed-broadcast
 encapsulation ppp
 async dynamic routing
 async mode dedicated

My problem is that I've "No Hellos (Passive interface)"

2503-bar#sh ip ospf interface async1
Async1 is up, line protocol is up
  Internet Address 192.19.18.1/24, Area 5
  Process ID 5, Router ID 190.1.1.1, Network Type POINT_TO_POINT, Cost:
5263
  Transmit Delay is 1 sec, State POINT_TO_POINT,
  Timer intervals configured, Hello 10, Dead 40, Wait 40, Retransmit 5
    No Hellos (Passive interface)
  Neighbor Count is 0, Adjacent neighbor count is 0
  Suppress hello for 0 neighbor(s)

And obviously this doesn't allow to form the adjacency with the other
router,I tried to use the no version of the passive-interface command to
enable routing updates to be sent over this interface, even when I don't
put in my configuration "passive interface Async5", and it doesn't
appear in my conf.

because of this I suppose that IOS doesn't allow to form adjacencies in
ASYNC interfaces. am I correct?. in this case anybody knows Why?

Besides, looking for Information I've found in the CCO:

>Configuring a Simplex Ethernet or Serial Interface
>
>Because simplex interfaces between two devices on an Ethernet represent only o
ne network segment, for OSPF you must configure >the transmitting interface to
be a passive interface. This prevents OSPF from sending hello packets for the t
ransmitting >interface. Both devices are able to see each other via the hello p
acket generated for the receiving interface.
>
>This means that the suppression of sending hello packets is required on the sp
ecified interface. This is accomplished using >the following command:
>
>passive interface type number
>
>Note Why are they called simplex interfaces? Simplex means half duplex, and th
is means they typically have one transmitter. >However, the newer devices have
interfaces that allow full duplex, which means fewer collisions during transmis
sions. Most >interfaces default to simplex.

I can't understad "Simplex means half duplex", I never need to
configure passive interfaces for ethernet or Serial interfaces and
obviously everithing works fine.

any ideas about what means this information?

Regards,

Alejandro.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:24:29 GMT-3