From: Ryan Hoffman (ryan.hoffman@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Aug 23 2000 - 12:11:06 GMT-3
ip classless, ip subnet-zero on both...
-----Original Message-----
From: David FAHED [mailto:dfahed@outremer.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2000 8:30 AM
To: Ryan Hoffman
Subject: Re: Simple RIP -> OSPF redistribution?
are you in ip classless?
Ryan Hoffman wrote:
> As anyone else seen the same thing I am? r9 sends 192.168.1.0 to r11.
r11
> won't put it in it's routing table. If I remove the lo0 on r11
> (192.168.1.0/25), r11 then accepts this and puts it in it's routing table
as
> 192.168.1.0/24 as expected. I can then readd the l0 on r11 and both
routes
> for 192.168.1.x stay in r11's routing table. However, when a clear ip
route
> is done on r11, the /24 disappears. I've added 'network 192.168.1.0' to
> r11's 'router rip' but this didn't help. Is there a trick to fixing this,
> or must I ensure that subnets of major networks aren't discontiguous with
> RIP?
>
> r9 e0---e1 r11
>
> r9
> ==
> interface Loopback0
> ip address 192.168.1.129 255.255.255.128
> !
> interface Loopback1
> ip address 192.168.0.129 255.255.255.128
> !
> interface Ethernet0
> ip address 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.128
> !
> router rip
> network 192.168.0.0
> network 192.168.1.0
>
> r11
> ===
> interface Loopback0
> ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.128
> !
> interface Ethernet0
> ip address 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.128
> media-type 10BaseT
> !
> interface Ethernet1
> ip address 192.168.0.2 255.255.255.128
> media-type 10BaseT
> !
> router ospf 1
> redistribute rip subnets
> network 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.127 area 0
> !
> router rip
> network 192.168.0.0
>
> r11#sh ip route
> Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
> D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
> N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
> E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP
> i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, * - candidate
> default
> U - per-user static route, o - ODR
>
> Gateway of last resort is not set
>
> 192.168.0.0/25 is subnetted, 2 subnets
> C 192.168.0.0 is directly connected, Ethernet1
> R 192.168.0.128 [120/1] via 192.168.0.1, 00:00:15, Ethernet1
> 192.168.1.0/25 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> C 192.168.1.0 is directly connected, Loopback0
> 192.168.2.0/25 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> C 192.168.2.0 is directly connected, Ethernet0
> r11#debug rip
> *Mar 1 16:06:16: RIP: received v1 update from 192.168.0.1 on Ethernet1
> *Mar 1 16:06:16: 192.168.0.128 in 1 hops
> *Mar 1 16:06:16: 192.168.1.0 in 1 hops
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:24:29 GMT-3