From: Eric Fairfield (ericfair@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Aug 22 2000 - 16:02:56 GMT-3
You would loose your virtual links if a different address takes over the
RID. To fix/deal with this you change your Virtual link configuration of if
you have 12.x code you manually set the Router ID so it becomes a non-issue
if you add a new interface.
----- Original Message -----
From: Sam Munzani <sam@chinet.com>
To: Tony Medeiros <tonygreat@home.com>
Cc: peter brown <pita40@hotmail.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 1:34 PM
Subject: Re: Loopback & OSPF
> I understand that. What would you do if lab instructions specifies not to
> use any loopback interfaces unless specified. What happens after reboot?
>
> On Tue, 22 Aug 2000, Tony Medeiros wrote:
>
> > Nope, It doesn't need to in the OSPF process. It just needs to be in
an
> > "up" and "up" condition. OSPF picks the highest "active" interface to
be
> > the router ID. If you configure a higher address later it won't change
the
> > router ID however unless you restart OSPR neighbor negotiation, i.e.
reload
> > or shut/no shut the interfaces. This isn't a big deal unless you've
> > configured virtual links with use router ID's as anchor points.
> > Take care,
> > Tony Medeiros
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "peter brown" <pita40@hotmail.com>
> > To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 6:02 AM
> > Subject: Loopback & OSPF
> >
> >
> > > If I have loopback int. for router id in ospf, do I need to add that
int.
> > > to an area. Is it necessary to add a network statement for that
loopback
> > > int. address?
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:24:28 GMT-3