From: Simon Baxter (Simon.Baxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Aug 21 2000 - 22:43:21 GMT-3
In reading more it looks like my priority queue option is flawed because
everything is still mounting into the same queue - and the IOS will service
that queue first. So if E1 pumps loads into the queue, it will get loads of
the bandwidth. Basically all source interfaces are pouring into the same
bucket which is emptying at a fixed rate with no priority.
Breaking the sources up into queue numbers is the only way.
When would you use traffic shaping over queuing?? I'm going to have a
read...
Simon
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon Baxter
> Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 11:27 AM
> To: CCIE Group Study (E-mail)
> Subject: queuing
>
> Am I correct with the following?
>
> If you were asked to build 4 queues, attach to serial 3. Each queue
> should get 25% of the bandwidth. The outgoing queued packets will be
> evenly sourced from 4 interfaces : int e0, int s0, int s1 and int lo0.
>
> Would this be the config??
>
> queue-list 3 interface Ethernet0 1
> queue-list 3 interface Serial0 2
> queue-list 3 interface Serial1 3
> queue-list 3 interface Loopback0 4
> queue-list 3 queue 1 limit 1
> queue-list 3 queue 2 limit 1
> queue-list 3 queue 3 limit 1
> queue-list 3 queue 4 limit 1
> !
> int s3
> custom-queue-list 3
>
>
>
> could you also do this :
>
> priority-list 1 interface Ethernet0 high
> priority-list 1 interface Ethernet1 high
> priority-list 1 interface Ethernet2 high
> priority-list 1 queue-limit 1 1 1 1
> !
> int s0
> priority-group 1
>
>
> cheers.
>
>
> Simon Baxter
> Network Consultant
> Logical Networks
> simon.baxter@au.logical.com
> Phone: +61 3 9522 9203
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:24:28 GMT-3