From: Kenneth Kriel (kkriel@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Aug 09 2000 - 11:44:46 GMT-3
I agree with you that NLSP and EIGRP should not automatically
redistribute, but according to Caslow p514 you need to specify ipx
nlsp rip off and ipx nlsp sap off - on the interface, then try it
again !
So I would presume that you are still running rip on those interfaces.
Do you mind sharing your configs so that we could look at it ?
Ken
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Eric Fairfield
Sent: Sunday, August 06, 2000 6:06 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: IPX EIGRP/NLSP Issue
I have R1 as the hub of my network with a couple of spokes. I have
enabled EIGRP on the WAN and NLSP on LAN of R2 and R3. R2 and R3 are
connected to each other via E0. E1 on R2 and R3 have an IPX network
number also assigned them also. E0 on both R2 and R3 have IPX network
number 225 while R2 E1 is 275 and R3 E1 is 250. These Ex interfaces
are configured for NLSP while the S0 Frame relay interfaces are
configured for EIGRP. I have done an IPX ROUTER RIP, NO NETWORK ALL
to disable RIP.
The problem is that R1 sees the NLSP routes of 225,250,275 learned via
EIGRP. To my knowledge EIGRP and NLSP do not automatically
redistribute. NLSP adjacencies are formed and NLSP routes are learned
if EIGRP is removed.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:24:23 GMT-3