From: RyanB (rbenigno@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Aug 04 2000 - 14:38:22 GMT-3
Supposidly the new 520 can support 385 MBps, the 515 can do 120 Mbps, and
the 506 will do 10 Mbps. I believe the max on older 520's was 170 MBps and
I'm not sure on the other units... While you can't do FEC, gigabit is now
supported.
-Ryan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Morris" <smorris@mentortech.com>
To: "'Andrew'" <arousch@home.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2000 6:37 AM
Subject: RE: pix
> According to the marketing stuff with the PIX520 (at least which came with
> mine), it talked about handling throughpt "up to" DS-3. So I take that to
> mean, not reasonably exceeding...
>
> How much throughput have you heard of?
>
> Scott
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Andrew
> Sent: Friday, August 04, 2000 9:17 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: pix
>
>
> The PIX can't do FEC and absolutely can handle more than DS3 throughput.
I
>
> At 12:58 AM 8/4/00 -0400, you wrote:
> >Actually, your answer lies in whether you're doing NAT 0 (that's a zero)
> >translation, or full pass-through static. Inside and outside can
> >technically be in the same subnet at that point.
> >
> >Bear in mind that the PIX is a manually (or RIP (ick)) route device.
> >
> >AFAK, there is no fast etherchannel ability on the PIX model. It would
be
> >interesting, but the basic aggregation of even the high-end PIX can't
> handle
> >more than a DS-3 in speed, so what would be the point?
> >
> >Scott
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> >Derek Small
> >Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2000 6:52 PM
> >To: Chris Kirschke; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >Cc: rharrison@mentorlabs.com
> >Subject: Re: pix
> >
> >
> >I'm pretty sure the answer is, "only if they are part of a FEC group".
Why
> >would you want to put two ports on the same subnet?
> >
> >Derek Small
> >CCIE # 5832, Nortel NCSE
> >513-703-7059
> >dwsmall@fatkid.com
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: Chris Kirschke <durnie@email.com>
> >To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Cc: <rharrison@mentorlabs.com>
> >Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2000 6:44 PM
> >Subject: pix
> >
> >
> > > Can two ports on a pix be on the same subnet? The ports will be on
> >seperate
> > > cards. Any help?
> > >
> > > Chris Kirschke
> > > Cisco Administrator
> > > Organic Online
> > > durnie@organic.com
> > >
> > >
> > > -----------------------------------------------
> > > FREE! The World's Best Email Address @email.com
> > > Reserve your name now at http://www.email.com
> > >
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:24:21 GMT-3