From: Scott Morris (smorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Aug 04 2000 - 01:58:01 GMT-3
Actually, your answer lies in whether you're doing NAT 0 (that's a zero)
translation, or full pass-through static. Inside and outside can
technically be in the same subnet at that point.
Bear in mind that the PIX is a manually (or RIP (ick)) route device.
AFAK, there is no fast etherchannel ability on the PIX model. It would be
interesting, but the basic aggregation of even the high-end PIX can't handle
more than a DS-3 in speed, so what would be the point?
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Derek Small
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2000 6:52 PM
To: Chris Kirschke; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Cc: rharrison@mentorlabs.com
Subject: Re: pix
I'm pretty sure the answer is, "only if they are part of a FEC group". Why
would you want to put two ports on the same subnet?
Derek Small
CCIE # 5832, Nortel NCSE
513-703-7059
dwsmall@fatkid.com
----- Original Message -----
From: Chris Kirschke <durnie@email.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Cc: <rharrison@mentorlabs.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2000 6:44 PM
Subject: pix
> Can two ports on a pix be on the same subnet? The ports will be on
seperate
> cards. Any help?
>
> Chris Kirschke
> Cisco Administrator
> Organic Online
> durnie@organic.com
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------
> FREE! The World's Best Email Address @email.com
> Reserve your name now at http://www.email.com
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:24:21 GMT-3