From: Andrew (arousch@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Aug 04 2000 - 10:17:11 GMT-3
The PIX can't do FEC and absolutely can handle more than DS3 throughput. I
At 12:58 AM 8/4/00 -0400, you wrote:
>Actually, your answer lies in whether you're doing NAT 0 (that's a zero)
>translation, or full pass-through static. Inside and outside can
>technically be in the same subnet at that point.
>
>Bear in mind that the PIX is a manually (or RIP (ick)) route device.
>
>AFAK, there is no fast etherchannel ability on the PIX model. It would be
>interesting, but the basic aggregation of even the high-end PIX can't handle
>more than a DS-3 in speed, so what would be the point?
>
>Scott
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
>Derek Small
>Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2000 6:52 PM
>To: Chris Kirschke; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Cc: rharrison@mentorlabs.com
>Subject: Re: pix
>
>
>I'm pretty sure the answer is, "only if they are part of a FEC group". Why
>would you want to put two ports on the same subnet?
>
>Derek Small
>CCIE # 5832, Nortel NCSE
>513-703-7059
>dwsmall@fatkid.com
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Chris Kirschke <durnie@email.com>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Cc: <rharrison@mentorlabs.com>
>Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2000 6:44 PM
>Subject: pix
>
>
> > Can two ports on a pix be on the same subnet? The ports will be on
>seperate
> > cards. Any help?
> >
> > Chris Kirschke
> > Cisco Administrator
> > Organic Online
> > durnie@organic.com
> >
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------
> > FREE! The World's Best Email Address @email.com
> > Reserve your name now at http://www.email.com
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:24:21 GMT-3