From: Brian Hescock (bhescock@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Aug 02 2000 - 09:10:40 GMT-3
Jason,
Yes but with one significant difference, RTRA would still be the active
router so all packets would be sent there first then it would forward the
packets to RTRB. We would end up routing the packets twice instead of
only once if RTRB was the active router. Another disadvantage is you end
up having the switch between the two routers handling twice as much data.
Brian
On Tue, 1 Aug 2000, Jason T. Rohm wrote:
> I am trying to understand the questions but... wouldn't simple routing force
> the data through the other PVC?
>
> IE:
>
> PVC1 = RTRA to RTRC
> PVC2 = RTRB to RTRC
>
> If the PVC1 goes down, RTRA's new route to RTRC will through RTRB any ways,
> if the local default gateway is set to RTRA, it will just issue an ICMP
> redirect to move the data to RTRB.
>
> Maybe I am wrong...
>
> -Jason T. Rohm
> jtrohm@athenet.net
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Johnny Dedon
> Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2000 5:27 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: HSRP tracking of Frame ciruits
>
> Can anyone tell me how to track the status of a serial frame relay
> connection with hsrp setup on the lan connections. I want to failover my
> LAN connection if the far end of my primary router's frame connection is
> down.
>
> RTRC
> X |
> ------------------------------
> Frame Relay
> ------------------------------
> | |
> RTRA - hsrp - RTRB
> | |
> -------Ethernet-----------------
>
> Router A is primary and link at RTRC fails
>
>
> Johnny
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:24:20 GMT-3