From: Brian Edwards (bedwards@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jul 18 2000 - 20:36:46 GMT-3
> Yes it does.
> My question arose as I read Caslow's book where he states
> the opposite.
> I am finding a few of these items in his book which don't seem to be
> accurate.
I think Caslow is talking about the RIP/IGRP split-horizon. Are you sure
he's referring to EIGRP S-H?
> I also have an issue with the statement that if one does
> a static map on
> a physical interface and also is resolvng a dynamic mapping
> on that same
> interface via IARP, the dynamic mapping will go away on reboot if the
> dynamic mapping is referencing the DLCI and same protocol as
> the static. I
> have a dynamic mapping to my hub, and add a static mapping to
> my remote
> spoke referencing the same DLCI and protocol. The dynamic
> mapping returns
> after a reboot of both ends, along with the static mapping.
> This also goes against the text in Caslows book. I've
> done it a bunch of
> times.
I think Caslow is referring to the fact that adding static maps disables
IARP requests on that router. The router still responds to IARP request from
other routers. BTW, it does not have to be the same DLCI (it does have to be
the same protocol).
> I guess one has to really check all this stuff
> themselves to be sure.
I couldn't agree more. Caslow's book is one of the better ones though. There
are a lot of books out there with total misinformation.
/brian
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:54 GMT-3