From: Kevin Young (kvyoung@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jul 17 2000 - 01:26:09 GMT-3
Earl,
I think because R1 is the Hub Router in the NBMA environment, R1 used two s
ub interface, to prevent split-horizon , R1 should be route-refector.
wish this help you.
**************************************
Kevin Young
Senior Network Engineer
Yinxi Electronic Information Co.,Ltd
(86)-10-82625798 x 810
**************************************
----- Original Message -----
From: Earl Aboytes <earl@linkline.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2000 4:17 PM
Subject: Lab3, BGP and route-reflectors
> In ccbootcamp lab 3 the initial BGP design requires that R2 and R5 not have
> more than one remote-as 2 statement. OK, I understand that means that there
> must be a route reflector somewhere. What I cannot figure out is where to
> put the route reflector. The solution puts it at R1. My thoughts were that
> I should use a router that has an EBGP connection. I thought that I should
> use R3 as an EBGP to R4 and also R7. I could then reflect routes to the
> entire AS. Doesn't that make more sense? Am I missing something here? Is
> it just a matter of preference?
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Earl Aboytes
> Senior Technical Conultant
> GTE Managed Solutions
> 805-381-8817
> earl.aboytes@telops.gte.com
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:54 GMT-3