From: Kevin M. Woods (kev@xxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Jul 13 2000 - 16:10:26 GMT-3
// I'm assuming that IA and E2 areas are not good enough to sync. I just
// added a 155.1.1.1 in the same area as this router and it syncs up without a
// problem. Can anyone confirm?
I don't know about IA, but E1/2 will certainly allow BGP to synchronize since
that's exactly what it's looking for (EBGP routes redistributed into an IGP).
The problem is that the E2 route is coming from RIP instead of EBGP (although
I think OSPF is the only protocol in which this is an issue).
// Given a BGP table of
//
// BGP table version is 7, local router ID is 40.1.1.1
// Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i -
// internal
// Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
//
// Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
// *> 20.1.1.0/24 0.0.0.0 0 32768 ?
// *>i103.0.0.0 30.1.1.4 1 100 0 6000 e <-no syn
c
// *>i151.1.1.1/32 30.1.1.4 0 100 0 i <-no sync
// *>i152.1.1.1/32 30.1.1.4 0 100 0 i <-no sync
// *>i153.1.1.1/32 30.1.1.4 0 100 0 i <-no sync
// *>i154.1.1.1/32 30.1.1.4 0 100 0 i <-synced stat
ic route added
// *>i155.1.1.1/32 20.1.1.2 0 100 0 i <-synced same
ospf area
That's weird output...according to it all those routes are synchronized. I'm
interested in knowing what IOS version this is. Did you know the routes were
not sync'd from "s ip bgp A.B.C.D"?
Kevin
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:53 GMT-3