Re: IRB and DLSW+

From: William Darkwah (william.darkwah@xxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jun 27 2000 - 16:44:02 GMT-3


   
This is the deal, when you configure traditional bridging ie , SRB,TB etc
the moment you put an interface in a
bridge-group, all protocols that are not being routed are bridged.

Now, when you configure IRB or CRB, the moment you put an interface in a
bridge-group every protocol is
bridge. All protocols are passed on to the BVI interface in the case of
IRB. If you want to enable irb routing
use "bridge x route prototol" command. If you want to route on a
bridge-group interface disable bridging of that
protocol with " no bridge x bridge protocol" command.

DLSW+ is used for IBM non routable protocols so if you turn it on, it will
allow you to route all routable protocols as
usual and bridge all the IBM non routable protocols. You do not need to know
anything detailed about bridging staff.

I hope this helps

William

----- Original Message -----
From: Vijaykrishna <vijaykrishna@netzero.net>
To: Jeff Sapiro <jsapiro@wnmail.wndev.att.com>; Earl Aboytes
<earl@linkline.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2000 1:43 PM
Subject: Re: IRB and DLSW+

I remember reading on DOC CD somewhere and I have noted this
Bridging rules:
1. if the interface is config with Network address that protocol is routed
even if the TB/SRB is enabled on that i/f
2. Protocol will be bridged if the network address is not config and TB/SRB
is enabled
3. No routing or bridging on the interface, if neither protocol addres nor
TB/SRB is config for the interface.

I believe IP routing should not be stopped if u enable SRB on the TR i/f
with IP address.
any comments ?

-Vijay

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Sapiro <jsapiro@wnmail.wndev.att.com>
To: Earl Aboytes <earl@linkline.com>
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Date: Tuesday, June 27, 2000 1:00 PM
Subject: Re: IRB and DLSW+

>CRB more likely
>-Jeff
>
>Earl Aboytes wrote:
>
>> Here is a question that I thought I had resolved until I started
>> reading the doc CD
>>
>> Assumptions:
>>
>> When you turn on dlsw in a router you have to bridge from Ethernet to
>> dlsw.When you turn on dlsw on a router you have to source-route bridge
>> from token ring to dlsw.
>>
>> Question:
>>
>> Did you just ruin routing of IP over the Ethernet and Token if you put
>> it a bridge group or turn on source route bridging?
>>
>> Possible answer:
>>
>> My guess is no.It seems that dlsw turns on IRB automatically.I thought
>> this was the answer for both token and Ethernet until I read the
>> following passage on the Doc CD.
>>
>> "Integrated routing and bridging is supported for transparent
>> bridging, but not for source-route bridging (SRB)."
>>
>> So what is the real answer?Did I lose routing of IP on my token
>> interface when I turned on SRB?I would guess that dlsw takes care of
>> this.Any thoughts on this?
>>
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>> Earl Aboytes
>>
>> Senior Technical Conultant
>>
>> GTE Managed Solutions
>>
>> 805-381-8817
>>
>> earl.aboytes@telops.gte.com
>>
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:43 GMT-3