From: William Darkwah (william.darkwah@xxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jun 26 2000 - 22:18:05 GMT-3
Try summarizing the ospf network to 168.10.1.0/26 and then redistribute.
I am not sure if ip default-net command will work in this scenerio because
the class B
network you are sourcing is part of the Serial link btw RA(s0) and RB(s1).
Create a static route
to null 0 for a dummy class B network and use that in RB.
Hope this helps
William
----- Original Message -----
From: tok cok <tokcok@hotmail.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2000 5:30 AM
Subject: Redistributing FLSM to VLSM
> Hi all,
>
> I was trying out some redistributing lab exericse on Classless to
Classful.
> But encounter some problem in solving the VLSM and FLSM issue.
>
> ---(e0)RA(s0)-------(S1)RB(s0)---(s0)RC(e0)---
>
> RA's e0 is running RIP 10.1.1.1/24
> RA's s0 is running IGRP 168.10.1.66/26
> RB's s1 is running IGRP 168.10.1.65/26
> RB's s0 is running OSPF 168.10.1.33/28
> RC's s0 is running OSPF 168.10.1.34/28
> RC's e0 is running OSPF 168.10.1.17/30
>
> I'm trying to do a mutual redistribution between OSPF and IGRP, so that RA
> will knows how to reach OSPF networks and RB know the IGRP network.
>
> I went through Caslow's book. He said either use summarization or annouce
> an IP default-network on the redistributing router into the IGRP domain
> (which I think should be RB in this case)
>
> I've try using ip default-network, but confuse on how to do it. I try
> specified ip default-network 168.10.0.0 on RB, but it doesn't get
advertised
> to RA IGRP domain.
>
> I've try using a default route at RA, ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
168.10.1.65.
> But the default route gets advertised to the RIP domain, which I do not
want
> that.
>
> Can anyone enlighten me on how to solve this Redistributing between VLSM
and
> FLSM issues?
>
> Thanks in advance!!!
> tok
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:43 GMT-3