RE: Redistributing FLSM to VLSM

From: Chia Kim Seng, Sr Network Spec, SCS-Networks (chiaks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jun 27 2000 - 00:09:50 GMT-3


   
You can do a summarization on RA using summary-address command to summary
all the 28 bits and and 30 bits routes to 26 bits route. Then redistribute
to IGRP.
Use keyword, 'not-advertise' with summary-address command to suppress this
route from being advertised into the OSPF domain as type-7.

e.g summary-address x.x.x.x m.m.m.m not-advertise

try it, let me know if this works?

May all being be happy!

-----Original Message-----
From: tok cok [mailto:tokcok@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2000 2:30 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Redistributing FLSM to VLSM

Hi all,

I was trying out some redistributing lab exericse on Classless to Classful.

But encounter some problem in solving the VLSM and FLSM issue.

    ---(e0)RA(s0)-------(S1)RB(s0)---(s0)RC(e0)---

RA's e0 is running RIP 10.1.1.1/24
RA's s0 is running IGRP 168.10.1.66/26
RB's s1 is running IGRP 168.10.1.65/26
RB's s0 is running OSPF 168.10.1.33/28
RC's s0 is running OSPF 168.10.1.34/28
RC's e0 is running OSPF 168.10.1.17/30

I'm trying to do a mutual redistribution between OSPF and IGRP, so that RA
will knows how to reach OSPF networks and RB know the IGRP network.

I went through Caslow's book. He said either use summarization or annouce
an IP default-network on the redistributing router into the IGRP domain
(which I think should be RB in this case)

I've try using ip default-network, but confuse on how to do it. I try
specified ip default-network 168.10.0.0 on RB, but it doesn't get advertised

to RA IGRP domain.

I've try using a default route at RA, ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 168.10.1.65.

But the default route gets advertised to the RIP domain, which I do not want

that.

Can anyone enlighten me on how to solve this Redistributing between VLSM and

FLSM issues?

Thanks in advance!!!
tok



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:43 GMT-3