From: pradeep (pradeep.divakar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun May 28 2000 - 21:23:07 GMT-3
Can some one stop this spam.
Its freedom of expression world and everyone has right to say ,but to
comment it right or wrong is none of our responsibility or business.
This is not a place to test anybody's ability or strength but to help
common folks entering or learn about the the subject this website has been
on.
correct me if am wrong.
Lets stop this and try to regain our tract
pradeep
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Ryan B
> Sent: Monday, 29 May 2000 06:14
> To: pkm@calweb.com; ciscosystems
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: My perspective
>
>
> I certainly fail to see how my post to Yong is beating him up. In my
> opinion it is actually help him! Maybe he'll take the
> opportunity to figure
> things out for himself and thereby make himself a better engineer and more
> prepared for the CCIE lab exam. How is this doing him an
> injustice? Where
> is the negative impact of keeping actual CCIE lab test questions
> protected?
> Do we know if Yong had this lab or if someone he knows wrote
> theirs out word
> for word and gave it to him? Do we want to encourage this type
> of behavior?
> Don't you think if Cisco wanted everyone to know the answer to questions
> beforehand they would give the lab scenarios out on their own? Have you
> ever seen me comment negatively on any other questions posted to
> this list?
> Given this, how is what I did wrong!
>
> I don't think this list exists for just answering questions. Rather to
> provides a forum for helping others gain a real understanding of
> technologies and the various skills, such as troubleshooting or
> finding the
> answer to a question, necessary to not only pass the CCIE lab but
> also be a
> valuable engineer. Answering the questions Yong posted is doing a
> disservice to him, you, and the certification. And while it can
> be argued a
> CCIE who doesn't know his stuff won't be able to make it in the
> real world,
> I don't want to see that become the case... There is a time when
> MCSE meant
> something too (I know, this is an extreme comparison).
>
> You are making judgments and coming to conclusions about me that
> are totally
> unfounded. You have no clue as to where I am in my career path,
> nor what my
> abilities are. I also find it ironic that you are beating up on me in the
> same mail you condemn me for beating up on someone else...
>
> -Ryan, CCIE #5847
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <pkm@calweb.com>
> To: "ciscosystems" <ciscosystems@sina.com>
> Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2000 9:33 PM
> Subject: Re: My perspective
>
>
> > Obviously CCIE title does not give anyone the right to beat up
> on anyone.
> I have
> > met some individuals like Ryan in my career. Usually, these
> type of person
> do
> > not go too far in their career. CCIE title will get you so far. Many
> companies
> > these days are looking at individuals possessing as welll technical
> skills as
> > business skills. Soft skills is much more important than
> technical skills
> in the
> > long run. My 2 cents.By the way, I forgot to mention that english is my
> second
> > language:)
> >
> > Phillip
> >
> >
> > ciscosystems wrote:
> >
> > > Hello everyone,
> > >
> > > I am lurking in this list, recently hear many people attack
> > > someone who asked one question about real lab test, I almost
> > > agree these criticism, but i want to declare, these guys must
> > > preserve their moral integrity, i don't want to bring up dead
> > > horse, but i'm so sorry for Ryan (CCIE#5847???), you
> really don't
> > > have right to comment others, give some evidence:
> > >
> > >
> > > May 25,2000 Ryan wrote:
> > >
> > > Gee, where did you get all these questions? I must be
> psychic, because
> I
> > > just happen to know the answer to every question you've asked and most
> > > likely every question you're going to ask.
> > >
> > > Please, nobody help this guy... Let him figure this stuff out on his
> own.
> > > I'm not just being a jerk here... I'm sure you know what I'm getting
> at...
> > >
> > > Ryan, CCIE #5847
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Yong" <yanyong@ihw.com.cn>
> > > To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2000 11:04 AM
> > > Subject: OSPF neighbor
> > >
> > > > i have three router on ethernet segment runing OSPF and well,I not
> hope
> > > establish neighbor when other router attach the segment, not use ospf
> > > authenticate.
> > > > can i hoe to configure ?
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > > best regards
> > > > Yong
> > >
> > > BUT, see this:
> > > April 25, Ryan wrote, subject: sanity check...
> > >
> > > If I wanted to filter out 0x0004, 0x0008 & 0x000c LSAP's would "0x000c
> > > 0xfff3" cover all three? Next, what is a "test frame" as it
> applies to
> SNA?
> > > How would I filter that?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Ryan
> > >
> > > the above question is one real lab question, somebody should know it,
> > > Ryan asked this question on the day before going to San Joes for his
> > > first try, in that try , Ryan got his number, Ryan is pure? i don't
> > > believe he could get the number on his first try without knowing the
> > > total lab question, include the troubleshooting!!!
> > >
> > > I do not want to displease someone, but i wish someone criticize
> > > others who should stand up!!!
> > >
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > ciscosystems mailto:ciscosystems@sina.com
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:32 GMT-3