From: Earl Aboytes (earl@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu May 25 2000 - 18:12:01 GMT-3
Is this one of those access lists that has a mask for the mask?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Earl Aboytes
Senior Technical Conultant
GTE Managed Solutions
805-381-8817
earl.aboytes@telops.gte.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of Scott
Morris
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2000 12:06 PM
To: Robert_Wang@toyota.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: supernet
Judging by the bit boundaries, you'd need to go with 172.16.0.0/21, which
covers:
172.16.0.0/24
172.16.1.0/24
172.16.2.0/24
172.16.3.0/24
172.16.4.0/24
172.16.5.0/24
172.16.6.0/24
172.16.7.0/24
So if you can live with "eating" those extra subnets, that's it. Otherwise,
don't summarize.
Scott Morris, MCSE, CNE(3.x), CCDP (R&S), CCIE (R&S) #4713, Security
Specialization, CCNA - WAN Switching
CCSI #21903
smorris@ccci.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
Chesapeake Network Solutions http://www.ccci.com
Cell Phone: 941-350-8590 e-mail:smorris@ccci.com
Pager: 800-490-1326 Fax: 606-225-8403
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Robert_Wang@toyota.com
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2000 2:53 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: supernet
How do I create a supernet to cover 172.16.1.0/24 and 172.16.3.0/24 and
172.16.5.0/24??
-Robert-
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:31 GMT-3