From: Earl Aboytes (earl@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu May 25 2000 - 18:11:58 GMT-3
This would be very similar to my earlier response. 192.168.0.0
255.255.249.0. In an access-list this would be 192.168.0.0 0.0.6.255.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Earl Aboytes
Senior Technical Conultant
GTE Managed Solutions
805-381-8817
earl.aboytes@telops.gte.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Robert_Wang@toyota.com
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2000 12:59 PM
To: smorris@ccci.com
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: supernet
So if I need to create an access list to permit only 172.16.1.0, 172.16.3.0
and
172.16.5.0/24, it will be ----
"access-list 10 permit 172.16.0.0 0.0.7.255", but it will allow the whole
172.16.0.0/21 subnet!!
Now, say my OSPF domain receives a bunch of RIP routes 192.168.1.0, 2.0,
3.0,
4.0, and 192.168.5.0 through redistribution, if I want to append a
"route-map"
to "redistribute rip" under OSPF section to only permit the even routes
192.168.2.0 and 192.168.4.0 coming into my OSPF, what will be the
access-list
and its wild card mask?
Thanks,
Robert
"Scott Morris" <smorris@ccci.com> on 05/25/2000 12:05:49 PM
Please respond to smorris@ccci.com
To: Robert Wang/Vendors/Toyota@Toyota, ccielab@groupstudy.com
cc:
Subject: RE: supernet
Judging by the bit boundaries, you'd need to go with 172.16.0.0/21, which
covers:
172.16.0.0/24
172.16.1.0/24
172.16.2.0/24
172.16.3.0/24
172.16.4.0/24
172.16.5.0/24
172.16.6.0/24
172.16.7.0/24
So if you can live with "eating" those extra subnets, that's it. Otherwise,
don't summarize.
Scott Morris, MCSE, CNE(3.x), CCDP (R&S), CCIE (R&S) #4713, Security
Specialization, CCNA - WAN Switching
CCSI #21903
smorris@ccci.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
Chesapeake Network Solutions http://www.ccci.com
Cell Phone: 941-350-8590 e-mail:smorris@ccci.com
Pager: 800-490-1326 Fax: 606-225-8403
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Robert_Wang@toyota.com
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2000 2:53 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: supernet
How do I create a supernet to cover 172.16.1.0/24 and 172.16.3.0/24 and
172.16.5.0/24??
-Robert-
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:31 GMT-3