From: Robert_Wang@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue May 23 2000 - 16:17:47 GMT-3
Earl,
Thanks for your comments.
Andy,
I think the masks for IPX are similar to IP where 255.255.255.0 matches a class
C address (199.1.1.0).
Same case for IPX NLSP area / mask 00002000 / fffff000 represents area 2000
through 2fff.
On the other hand, the masks in any Access List should always be INVERSE MASK!!
-Robert-
AndyChang@mesiniaga.com.my on 05/22/2000 08:36:39 PM
Please respond to AndyChang@mesiniaga.com.my
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
cc: (bcc: Robert Wang/Vendors/Toyota)
Subject: RE: Dlsw mac address
Hello,
The syntax as I read it seems to imply the below:
dlsw icanreach {mac-exclusive | netbios-exclusive [remote] | mac-address
mac-addr
[mask mask] | netbios-name name | saps}
no dlsw icanreach {mac-exclusive | netbios-exclusive [remote] | mac-address
mac-addr
[mask mask] | netbios-name name | saps}
Syntax Description
..
mac-address mac-addr
Configures a MAC address that this router can locally reach
.
mask mask
(Optional) MAC address mask in hexadecimal h.h.h. The "f"
value represents the "don't care" bit
and the "0" value represents the "care" bit. The mask
indicates which bits in the MAC address are
relevant.
Shouldn't
> ** To permit or reach only one MAC address
> 4000.3745.0003, use
>
> 1. dlsw icanreach mac-adddress 4000.3745.0003 mask
> ffff.ffff.ffff
be
> 1. dlsw icanreach mac-adddress 4000.3745.0003 mask
> 0000.0000.0000
and
> 3. dlsw icanreach mac-address 4000.3745.0000 mask
> ffff.ffff.0000
be
> 3. dlsw icanreach mac-address 4000.3745.0000 mask
> 0000.0000.ffff
?
IMHO
Andy.
"Earl Aboytes" <earl@linkline.com>@groupstudy.com on 23-05-2000 09:34:31 AM
Please respond to "Earl Aboytes" <earl@linkline.com>
Sent by: nobody@groupstudy.com
To: "Muthu Mohanasundaram" <mmsundar@yahoo.com>, <Robert_Wang@toyota.com>,
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: Dlsw mac address
Robert,
Although your lists are constructed correctly, if you want to show
reachability to one and only one mac address you must use the dlsw icanreach
mac-exclusive command. This tells peers that it can reach only one mac
address. I am not sure if that was part of your question.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Earl Aboytes
Senior Technical Conultant
GTE Managed Solutions
805-381-8817
earl.aboytes@telops.gte.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of Muthu
Mohanasundaram
Sent: Monday, May 22, 2000 4:23 PM
To: Robert_Wang@toyota.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Dlsw mac address
Hi Bob,
I think you are correct.
But let's see if someone can confirm.
Mohan.
--- Robert_Wang@toyota.com wrote:
>
>
> Just like to clarify if the following masks are
> correct ---
>
> ** To permit or reach only one MAC address
> 4000.3745.0003, use
>
> 1. dlsw icanreach mac-adddress 4000.3745.0003 mask
> ffff.ffff.ffff
>
> 2. access-list 700 permit 4000.3745.0003
> 0000.0000.0000
>
> ** To permit or reach the range of 4000.3745.0000
> through 4000.3745.ffff, use
>
> 3. dlsw icanreach mac-address 4000.3745.0000 mask
> ffff.ffff.0000
>
> 4. access-list 701 permit 4000.3745.0000
> 0000.0000.ffff
>
>
> Are the above statements correct?? Please advice.
> Thanks.
>
> Robert
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:30 GMT-3