From: Muthu Mohanasundaram (mmsundar@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri May 19 2000 - 20:57:46 GMT-3
Hi,
I think the access-list is OK.
If you do not specify any wildcard mask, it is assumed
as 0.0.0.0.
Kevin, what networks do you have under OSPF and EIGRP?
Mohan.
--- Bill Dicks <wdicks@structure-tech.com> wrote:
> There is a problem matching the address list...the
> distribute-list reads it
> as matching all..you need to specify 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
> - where the wildcards
> indicate match ALL bits. IT may interpret 0.0.0.0
> as 0.0.0.0
> 255.255.255.255 - which is all/anything.
>
> Bill Dicks
> Structure Technologies, Inc
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of Kevin
> Young
> Sent: Friday, May 19, 2000 9:40 AM
> To: ccielab
> Subject: distribute-list
>
>
> Hi,guys, i met a problem as below:
>
> redistributing a default route(0.0.0.0/0)from
> ospf into eigrp, when use
> route-map, it works fine, only redistribute one
> route(0.0.0.0/0) into eigrp:
> router eigrp 10
> redistribute ospf 100 route-map a
> network 11.0.0.0
> default-metric 64 1000 255 1 1500
> access-list 1 permit 0.0.0.0
> route-map a permit 10
> match ip address 1
>
>
> when use distribute-list, it doesn't work fine,
> redsitributed all
> routes(included 0.0.0.0/0) into eigep:
> router eigrp 10
> redistribute ospf 100
> network 11.0.0.0
> default-metric 64 1000 255 1 1500
> distribute-list 1 out ospf 100
> access-list 1 permit 0.0.0.0
>
>
> but when use distribute-list 1 out interface , it
> also works fine, i'm
> puzzled, why it doesn't work using distribute-list 1
> out ospf 100 ? what
> about extended access-list?
>
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:30 GMT-3