From: Robert Patterson (rpatters@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu May 18 2000 - 12:08:23 GMT-3
The 16.0.0.0 the 160.160.0.0 are subsets of your aggregate
of 160.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 ......so it did work
>isn't atleast one of the subnets of the summarised network be in the routing
>table....
>-vj
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Kevin Young <kvyoung@sina.com>
>To: ccielab <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Date: Thursday, May 18, 2000 6:53 AM
>Subject: eigrp summary address
>
>
>>Hi, everyone, i encounter a problem and couldn't understand.
>>
>>i want to summarize some address which are not connecting to router's
>interfaces,here is configuration and route table:
>>
>>interface Ethernet0
>> ip address 137.20.50.7 255.255.255.0
>> ip summary-address eigrp 10 200.100.0.0 255.252.0.0
>> ip summary-address eigrp 10 16.0.0.0 240.0.0.0
>> ip summary-address eigrp 10 160.160.0.0 255.240.0.0
>> ip summary-address eigrp 10 8.0.0.0 248.0.0.0
>> ip summary-address eigrp 10 160.0.0.0 240.0.0.0
>>
>>router eigrp 10
>> network 137.20.0.0
>>
>>these summarized address are not connectting to interfaces, this is route
>table:
>>
>> 137.20.0.0/16 is variably subnetted,
>>C 137.20.50.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0
>>D 8.0.0.0/5 is a summary, 00:07:44, Null0
>>D 160.0.0.0/4 is a summary, 00:07:23, Null0
>>
>>the question is why only two addresses are summarized. but 16.0.0.0 and
>200.100.0.0 are not summarized, is there some tips?
>>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:30 GMT-3