Re: Problem with sec addressses in EIGRP

From: Brian Hescock (bhescock@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat May 13 2000 - 11:15:46 GMT-3


   
Abdul,
   I didn't understand what you meant in parts of your e-mail but the
problem is most likely related to the fact Cisco doesn't support EIGRP
neighbors on secondary ip addresses (although you see it work sometimes).

Brian

On Fri, 12 May 2000 abdul_rahim@ccsi.canon.com wrote:

> Hi,
> we have two RSMS and the fa0/0 port of a 7206 on the same Physical LAN
>
> I configured the vlan 1on RSM 1 with a secondary address of
> 146.184.75.1/24
> when I look in to the router I can see that route learning via EIGRP and
> same on the RSM2
>
> but when I add the address 146.184.75.2/24 as a secondary address on the
> vlan 1 interface on RSM2 ( which is running EIGRP as well)
> the route in the Main router vanishes
> I changed the delay parameter as well but I dont know why is this happening
> Can any body help me with it
> For the time being I added a static route on the router
> Thanks
> Abdul
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:29 GMT-3