RE: An DLSW PROBLEM

From: Asbjorn Hojmark (Asbjorn@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri May 05 2000 - 18:32:37 GMT-3

• Next message: Nnanna Obuba: "Re: An DLSW PROBLEM"
• Previous message: Bill Wade: "Re: quick DLSW+ question"
• Maybe in reply to: Li Chaoyong: "An DLSW PROBLEM"
• Next in thread: Nnanna Obuba: "Re: An DLSW PROBLEM"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> R1-------------R2---------------R3
>
> R1 have dlsw peer with R2. R2 have dlsw peer with R3. R1 have
> not dlsw peer with R3. R1 still can communication with R3. How
> to do?
>
> Border peers are not allow to use.

Border peers aren't necessary for this. If you set it up in the
lab, you'll see that it works with only two peers. DLSw doesn't
need to be fully meshed (as does RSRB, IIRC).

HTH,
-A

--
Heroes: Vint Cerf & Bob Kahn, Leonard Kleinrock, Robert Metcalfe
Links : http://www.hojmark.org/networking/

• Next message: Nnanna Obuba: "Re: An DLSW PROBLEM"
• Previous message: Bill Wade: "Re: quick DLSW+ question"
• Maybe in reply to: Li Chaoyong: "An DLSW PROBLEM"
• Next in thread: Nnanna Obuba: "Re: An DLSW PROBLEM"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:27 GMT-3