From: Derek Small \(Fuse\) (dwsmall@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed May 03 2000 - 21:37:46 GMT-3
Sorry for not getting back sooner guys. I'm in the process of updating a
bunch of the labs on the site. Several of the labs were written back when I
first started, and a few of them do have some errors. I hope to be
reposting all of them on Friday, (if I can get a couple of minutes during
the day to finish up the corrections.....)
I'm sorry I did not respond to you when you posted the error three months
ago Brad. I always try to get back to those that take the time to send in
tips about errors.
I see what you are talking about on this lab. I will have it corrected with
the others. This was one of the first labs that I posted (and it really is
not my finest work.....) Thanks to both of you for letting me know about
it. I'm always receptive to feedback on the labs, good or bad.
I do try to place a priority on accuracy, but unlike some other sites, this
is still a part time operation for me, so I don't have as much time as I
would like to work on the labs. That is why I rely so much on feedback from
users like yourselves. Like GroupStudy.com, I hope Fatkid.com will become a
reflection of the people that use the site.
Thanks
Derek Small
CCIE # 5832
dwsmall@fatkid.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Hedlund, Brad" <BHedlund@realapps.com>
To: "'Asbjorn Hojmark'" <Asbjorn@Hojmark.ORG>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2000 10:23 AM
Subject: RE: GTS in Fatkid Q&P lab
> I noticed the same error 3 months ago and sent a comment to the webmaster
> (Derek?) at fatkid.com directly.
> I never did get a response, nor does it appear that the error was
corrected.
> As much as I enjoyed fatkid.com, it doesnt appear to place a high priority
> on accurate information.
> Dont get me wrong, I think fatkid.com is a great contribution to this
> community.
> But keep in mind ... This is a FREE website. Dont expect alot from it,
and
> dont always trust that the information is 100% accurate. Take it for what
> its worth.
>
>
> Brad Hedlund
> Sr. Network Engineer
> CCIE #5530
> REAL Solutions, Elcamino Resources Ltd.
> Eden Prairie, MN.
> (952) 829-2877
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was browsing the labs on Fatkid.com and came across the Queuing
> > & Performance lab. http://www.fatkid.com/html/queuing.html
> >
> > The solution to question 5 says that 'traffic-shape group 101
> > 16000 32000 32000 1000' should ensure that traffic specified in
> > ACL 101 would get at least 16 kbps but no more than 32 kbps.
> >
> > I don't get it.
> >
> > The 12.1 command reference states that the third parameter is the
> > burst size (not the burst rate, bits not bps) and that the fourth
> > parameter is the excess burst size (not rate, bits not bps).
> >
> > I did a quick test on one of the routers in my lab:
> >
> > | ah-r3#conf t
> > | Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.
> > | ah-r3(config)#int s0
> > | ah-r3(config-if)#traffic-shape group 101 16000 32000 32000 1000
> > | ah-r3(config-if)#end
> > | ah-r3#sh traffic
> > |
> > | Interface Se0
> > | Access Target Byte Sustain Excess Interval
> > Increment Adapt
> > | VC List Rate Limit bits/int bits/int (ms)
> > (bytes) Active
> > | - 101 16000 8000 32000 32000 2000
> > 4000 -
> > | ah-r3#
> >
> > (Note, the router's set the interval to 2 secs).
> >
> > Anyone care to comment?
> > Derek?
> >
> > TIA,
> > -A
> > PS: (First) lab test on 08may/09may in Bruxelles.
> > --
> > Heroes: Vint Cerf & Bob Kahn, Leonard Kleinrock, Robert
> > Metcalfe, Jon Postel
> > Links : http://www.hojmark.org/networking/
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:27 GMT-3