From: Stanley Seow (stanley_seow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Apr 22 2000 - 03:27:41 GMT-3
Dave,
I tried both IPX RIP & IPX EIGRP and both works fine.
Stanley
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Dave Gingrich
> Sent: Friday, April 21, 2000 11:42 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: IPX Questions
>
>
>
> ...And then when you discover that eigrp won't work on a sub-interface,
> think RIP for the lan segment. :)
>
> -Dave
>
> At 10:35 AM 4/21/00 -0400, Brian Best wrote:
> >Stanley,
> >
> >Think sub-interface...I believe this will solve your problem.
> >
> >Good luck.
> >
> >Brian
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Stanley Seow [mailto:stanley_seow@techno-craft.com.sg]
> >Sent: Friday, April 21, 2000 9:55 AM
> >To: CCIELAB
> >Subject: IPX Questions
> >
> >
> >I bump into something that I really stuck at...
> >
> >I tried a few things, pls comment...
> >
> >I've 3 router on ethernet segment and I need to need to use 2
> network on the
> >LAN segment and have
> >full ipx routing table routing ...
> >
> >R1 - ipx network 1111
> >R2 - ipx network 1111
> >R3 - ipx network 2222
> >
> >I use the default encap for the 1111 network and uses sap for 2222
> >network...
> >The LAN runs ipx eigrp
> >
> >How do I get the 2222 to see 1111 and all other IPX networks and vice
> >versa...
> >
> >I came out with an idea of tunneling gre between R2 and R3
> running IPX RIP
> >between the tunnel over
> >IP. But this still does not work as I cannot get this to work....
> >
> >Should I use IPXWAN on the tunnel ??
> >Or should I use NLSP over the tunnel ?
> >
> >Stanley
> >
> >
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:15 GMT-3