From: Dave Gingrich (gingrich@xxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Apr 21 2000 - 12:42:03 GMT-3
...And then when you discover that eigrp won't work on a sub-interface,
think RIP for the lan segment. :)
-Dave
At 10:35 AM 4/21/00 -0400, Brian Best wrote:
>Stanley,
>
>Think sub-interface...I believe this will solve your problem.
>
>Good luck.
>
>Brian
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Stanley Seow [mailto:stanley_seow@techno-craft.com.sg]
>Sent: Friday, April 21, 2000 9:55 AM
>To: CCIELAB
>Subject: IPX Questions
>
>
>I bump into something that I really stuck at...
>
>I tried a few things, pls comment...
>
>I've 3 router on ethernet segment and I need to need to use 2 network on the
>LAN segment and have
>full ipx routing table routing ...
>
>R1 - ipx network 1111
>R2 - ipx network 1111
>R3 - ipx network 2222
>
>I use the default encap for the 1111 network and uses sap for 2222
>network...
>The LAN runs ipx eigrp
>
>How do I get the 2222 to see 1111 and all other IPX networks and vice
>versa...
>
>I came out with an idea of tunneling gre between R2 and R3 running IPX RIP
>between the tunnel over
>IP. But this still does not work as I cannot get this to work....
>
>Should I use IPXWAN on the tunnel ??
>Or should I use NLSP over the tunnel ?
>
>Stanley
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:15 GMT-3