From: Derek Small (Fuse) (dwsmall@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Apr 21 2000 - 14:21:15 GMT-3
I think you better check that again Dave. I just configured the scenario
that Stanley asked about and it worked fine.
Here are the routing tables from the three routers:
************
C 1111 (SAP), Et0.1
C 9999 (UNKNOWN), Lo0
E 2222 [307200/0] via 1111.0060.5cf4.04f6, age 00:05:40,
1u, Et0.1
E 5555 [435200/1] via 1111.0060.5cf4.04f6, age 00:04:15,
1u, Et0.1
E 6666 [409600/1] via 1111.0060.5cf4.04f6, age 00:04:00,
1u, Et0.1
************
C 1111 (SAP), Et0.1
C 2222 (NOVELL-ETHER), Et0.2
C 6666 (UNKNOWN), Lo0
E 5555 [409600/1] via 2222.0000.0c7e.e6bd, age 00:04:32,
1u, Et0.2
E 9999 [409600/1] via 1111.0000.0c3d.fcba, age 00:04:01,
1u, Et0.1
************
C 2222 (NOVELL-ETHER), Et0.2
C 5555 (UNKNOWN), Lo0
E 1111 [307200/0] via 2222.0060.5cf4.04f6, age 00:04:57,
1u, Et0.2
E 6666 [409600/1] via 2222.0060.5cf4.04f6, age 00:04:32,
1u, Et0.2
E 9999 [435200/1] via 2222.0060.5cf4.04f6, age 00:04:17,
1u, Et0.2
Also, if you check the Cisco docs, support of secondary interfaces for IPX
is going away. The correct way for future implementations of IPX where
multiple frame types are needed is to use sub interfaces.
What kind of problems have you run into with subs and EIGRP for IPX Dave?
Derek Small
dwsmall@fatkid.com
----- Original Message -----
From: Dave Gingrich <gingrich@dcg.org>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2000 11:42 AM
Subject: RE: IPX Questions
>
> ...And then when you discover that eigrp won't work on a sub-interface,
> think RIP for the lan segment. :)
>
> -Dave
>
> At 10:35 AM 4/21/00 -0400, Brian Best wrote:
> >Stanley,
> >
> >Think sub-interface...I believe this will solve your problem.
> >
> >Good luck.
> >
> >Brian
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Stanley Seow [mailto:stanley_seow@techno-craft.com.sg]
> >Sent: Friday, April 21, 2000 9:55 AM
> >To: CCIELAB
> >Subject: IPX Questions
> >
> >
> >I bump into something that I really stuck at...
> >
> >I tried a few things, pls comment...
> >
> >I've 3 router on ethernet segment and I need to need to use 2 network on
the
> >LAN segment and have
> >full ipx routing table routing ...
> >
> >R1 - ipx network 1111
> >R2 - ipx network 1111
> >R3 - ipx network 2222
> >
> >I use the default encap for the 1111 network and uses sap for 2222
> >network...
> >The LAN runs ipx eigrp
> >
> >How do I get the 2222 to see 1111 and all other IPX networks and vice
> >versa...
> >
> >I came out with an idea of tunneling gre between R2 and R3 running IPX
RIP
> >between the tunnel over
> >IP. But this still does not work as I cannot get this to work....
> >
> >Should I use IPXWAN on the tunnel ??
> >Or should I use NLSP over the tunnel ?
> >
> >Stanley
> >
> >
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:15 GMT-3