From: Chuah Eng Wee (chuahew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Apr 20 2000 - 09:48:45 GMT-3
I find "new format" ridiculous. Took the exam twice in Sydney and I was given
the whole set of day 1 paper. What happen if u can finish the first part
quickly ?? Sit there and wait for the proctor to issue the 2nd part of the exam
in the afternoon ? I think u can raise this up or check with Cisco.
Good Luck
Eng Wee
CCIE #5335, CCNP, CCDP
At 09:28 AM 4/20/00 +0800, AndyChang@mesiniaga.com.my wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I recently attended SIngapore's lab and was surprised by a few things.
>In my earlier attempt in Sydney, the whole 1st day's examination paper was
>given to me.
>
>However, in Singapore, I was given the 1st day's paper in two sections. AM
>(9:30-11:30am) and
>PM(12pm-5pm).
>The AM paper had requirements to set up routing domains etc. but did not
>specify the domain numbers
>to be used.
>The problem was that after lunch, the second part of the paper specified
>the domain numbers to be
>used and even some additional routing requirements.
>
>I found that I had to waste time reconfiguring/rechecking stuff I had done
>in the AM paper! I
>questioned the proctor and was
>told that this was a 'new' standard practised at all testing centres.
>
>Is this true? Can anyone confirm this? I find this 'new' rule ridiculuos!
>How can I plan the
>configuration without the second part of the paper? Further, if I am
>quicker in configuration, I may
>end up redoing a lot of the paper!
>
>The time given to me for configuration was 7 hours with 30 min for
>briefing on lab rules. In Sydney,
>we had 7.5 hours for lab and the time was 9-12:30, 1pm - 5pm. Why is this
>inconsistent? Again the
>proctor said that it is now 'standardized'.
>
>Can anyone confirm this?
>
>Thanks
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:14 GMT-3