From: Greg Schmitt (GSchmitt@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Mar 22 2000 - 18:44:54 GMT-3
Kevin,
The way I've seen CLIP used is between two or three routers across an ATM
cloud. The plus side of CLIP is that you don't need PVC's, and it is much
less trouble to setup than LANE. The down side is that it only works with
IP.
The Cisco CD has pretty good explanations about it, along with some
examples. Caslow's book also does a good description of it, and you can
compare it with LANE from his descriptions too.
Cheers,
Greg Schmitt
Internetwork Solutions Engineer
Total Network Solutions, Inc.
Voice: 410-349-9772
Cell: 443-822-5182
Pager: 888-773-0423 or pager.gschmitt@tns-inc.com
e-mail: GSchmitt@tns-inc.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Kevin Gannon
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2000 4:04 PM
To: Ccielab@Groupstudy.Com
Subject: ATM and Classical IP ?
Can someone please expalin what is to be gained by using classical IP. It is
intended for
use by end stations (PC's) rather than routers. Is it like a predecessor to
LANE to allow
it to be easily used by end stations in that they can treat the ATM cloud as
a ethernet
segment ?
Regards,
Kevin
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:06 GMT-3