From: Webb, Tremayne (TWebb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Mar 16 2000 - 17:07:40 GMT-3
I think he is saying that R1 learns the route from AS254 with an admin
distance of 20 then he redistributes it and r2 sees it as OSPF and
advertises it to R3 with an admin distance of 110 (meanwhile R3 has
learned the route via IBGP with an admin distance of 200). So the
answer is:
A) Stop redistributing it and let BGP do its thing (next-hop-self may
be necessary, depending...)
B) Change the admin distance of OSPF to 205 (generally frowned upon)
-tw
-----Original Message-----
From: Josef Dittli [mailto:dittli_josef@gmx.ch]
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2000 3:41 AM
To: brife@bignet.net
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Fwd: Re: BGP and Admin Distance
Hi Ben
I just received the other answers on this question!
The most are good points, but what I'm still miss
is the reason: Why would you like to see it as a
BGP-Route in R3?
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 09:33:47 +0100
To: "Ben Rife" <brife@bignet.net>
From: Josef Dittli <dittli_josef@gmx.ch>
Subject: Re: BGP and Admin Distance
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
At 22:29 15.03.00, you wrote:
I have asked this question before but have not received an answer.
If you have the following senario:
(AS254)----|-R1--R2--R3-|
(AS5) (AS5)
My routers are running OSPF.
R1 and R3 are running BGP in AS5. R2 is not running BGP.
A route coming from AS254 into AS5 (192.78.5.0) is redistributed at
R1 into OSPF. The problem is that my routers see it as an OSPF
route, not a BGP route, because of Admin Distance. What's the
remedy?
To see it as BGP-Routes, don't redistribute them to OSPF and run
BGP everywhere.
But I don't see any advantage of that!
Thx,
-Ben
Best regards
Josef
Vieli ganz liebi Grüss
Seppi
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:05 GMT-3