From: Ronald Doyle (Ronald.Doyle@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Mar 16 2000 - 06:13:29 GMT-3
To get them showing as BGP routes on R3 , my understanding is that you need
to
run IBGP between R3 and R1 and set no-syncronisation. Do not redistribute
into your IGP.
You might also have to use next hop self on R1 , if the network connecting
R1 and the remote AS are not in the
routing table.
The problem is R2 will drop any packets sent to these destinations , unless
it has some sort of default route to R1.
To simply get the routes in the table , the above will do.
Ronald Doyle
Senior Network Engineer
USKO Communications
This message contains information, which may be privileged and confidential
and subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you
may not peruse, use, disseminate, distribute or copy this message. If you
have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by
e-mail, facsimile or telephone and return or destroy the original message.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Josef Dittli [SMTP:dittli_josef@gmx.ch]
> Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2000 10:34 AM
> To: Ben Rife
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: BGP and Admin Distance
>
> At 22:29 15.03.00, you wrote:
>
>
> I have asked this question before but have not received an answer.
>
> If you have the following senario:
>
> (AS254)----|-R1--R2--R3-|
> (AS5) (AS5)
>
> My routers are running OSPF.
> R1 and R3 are running BGP in AS5. R2 is not running BGP.
> A route coming from AS254 into AS5 (192.78.5.0) is redistributed at
> R1 into OSPF. The problem is that my routers see it as an OSPF route, not
> a BGP route, because of Admin Distance. What's the remedy?
>
>
> To see it as BGP-Routes, don't redistribute them to OSPF and run BGP
> everywhere.
> But I don't see any advantage of that!
>
>
>
>
> Thx,
> -Ben
>
>
>
> Best regards
> Josef
> Vieli ganz liebi Grüss
> Seppi
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:05 GMT-3