From: Stephens, Paul [Prof.Serv] (Paul.Andrew.Stephens@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Mar 16 2000 - 12:52:00 GMT-3
Thanks everyone, just needed the ebgp mulithop
Anyone going to Brussels this week-end for the lab on 20/21 ??
Paul Stephens
UK INI Network Consultant
Networks and Systems Integration Services
Compaq Computer Ltd
*mailto:paul.andrew.stephens@compaq.com
<mailto:paul.andrew.stephens@compaq.com>
* Mobile +44 7818 457948
-----Original Message-----
From: Mohan Pokkali [mailto:Mohan.Pokkali@USKO.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2000 15:49
To: Stephens, Paul [Prof.Serv]; 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: RE: BGP Confederations
I believe you can use it. Provided it is reachable.
And off course ebgp multihop must be used.
I have not personally tried it.
Might try it this weekend.
Mohan
-----Original Message-----
From: Stephens, Paul [Prof.Serv]
[mailto:Paul.Andrew.Stephens@compaq.com]
Sent: 16 March 2000 05:10
To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: BGP Confederations
Has anyone used loopbacks as the address in the neighbor
statement, with the
update source statement, when going between sub AS's within
a confederation.
It works fine between two peers within the same AS running
IBGP and between
two two peers in different AS's running EBGP. I just can't
get it work
between two sub AS's within the confederation ??
What I wondered is it supported ?
Paul Stephens
UK INI Network Consultant
Networks and Systems Integration Services
Compaq Computer Ltd
*mailto:paul.andrew.stephens@compaq.com
<mailto:paul.andrew.stephens@compaq.com>
* Mobile +44 7818 457948
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:05 GMT-3