From: Khurram Khani (ajmal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Feb 22 2000 - 23:55:34 GMT-3
H.
>2. Can we use "schedular interval <msec>" command to lessen the
burden on CPU, considering CPU is under heavy loads, e.g., handling
too much debug traffic.Is >here any other method we can reduce the
burden on CPU in this situation?
Always Debug as specific as possible. For example if you try to debug
ip packets in a production
network environment, "debug ip packet de" simply give this command and
it will collapse your
router within seconds. But if you give "debug ip packet detail
<access-list #>" for a particular
souce-ip then you will reduce the burden a lot.
>Q1.
>How a PC(an ATM LEC, client) performs the IP ARP(Layer2->Layer3) ?
In Ethernet LAN, I believe IP broadcast Address is translated to mac
ffff.ffff.ffff so same should
happen in LANE as well. And Broadcasts should go to BUS.
regards
KHURRAM KHANI
----------------------------
Emirates Telecommunications Corporation.
----- Original Message -----
From: Muhammad Afaq Khan
To: ccielab
Sent: Sunday, December 31, 1995 11:13 AM
Subject: Two Qs
hello,
I'm confused with these TWO, can anyone please help me out, or just
give his/her opinion!!
Q1.
How a PC(an ATM LEC, client) performs the IP ARP(Layer2->Layer3) ?
Actually I know that BUS is involved with, when resolving a MAC to its
corresponding ATM address for an unknown LEC(client).But what about
the IP ARP broadcast, will it be handled by BUS too??
Q2. Can we use "schedular interval <msec>" command to lessen the
burden on CPU, considering CPU is under heavy loads, e.g., handling
too much debug traffic.Is there any other method we can reduce the
burden on CPU in this situation?
Thanx in advance,
- Muhammad Afaq Khan
CCIE-candidate(ccna,ccnp,ccda)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:22:54 GMT-3