From: pkm@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed Feb 02 2000 - 19:44:36 GMT-3
pkm@calweb.com wrote:
>
> bhanson wrote:
> >
> > Nope, you can't lose VLAN 1 on any trunk - it is the default behaviour.
> >
> > Brian Hanson
> >
> > Ben Rife wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks, That is pretty sneaky !!!
> > > One more question though...when I re-added the vlans 4 and 5, it also
> > > included the default vlan 1. Why did it do that? Is that avoidable?
> > > Thanks,
> > > Ben
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Denton Bobeldyk" <denny@kentwoodps.org>
> > > To: "Ben Rife" <brife@bignet.net>
> > > Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2000 4:47 PM
> > > Subject: Re: CAT5K Trunking
> > >
> > > > You have to use the 'clear trunk' command to clear out the vlans that
> > > > you don't want that port to trunk for.... sneaky eh?
> > > >
> > > > -Denny
> > > >
> > > > Ben Rife wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hey guys,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'd like to configure a trunk 1/1 so that it will carry only traffic
on
> > > VLAN4 and VLAN1.
> > > > >
> > > > > I entered the following on my switch:
> > > > >
> > > > > Console> (enable) set trunk 1/1 1,4
> > > > > Port 1/1 allowed vlans modified to 1-1000
> > > > >
> > > > > Why does it say 1-1000? Why not 1,4?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Ben
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
> > > > >
> > > > > Part.001Name: Part.001
> > > > > Type: Plain Text (text/plain)
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > -*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-
> > > > Denton Bobeldyk MCNE, CCDA, CCNA, CCSI, CCIE #5509
> > > > Email: denny@kentwoodps.org
> > > > Phone: 616-530-9196
> > > >
> > > > Cisco Certified Internetworking Expert #5509
> > > > (need you read anymore???)
> > > > Master CNE - Connectivity
> > > > Cisco Certified Design Associate
> > > > Cisco Certified Network Associate
> > > > Cisco Certified Systems Instructor
> > > >
> > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:22:52 GMT-3