From: Joel W. Ekis (jekis@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Feb 01 2000 - 23:38:06 GMT-3
At 07:42 AM 1/31/2000 -0700, Maljure, Sanjay wrote:
>
> Hi All,
> I had the following questions about the ECP1 course conducted by CCCI.
>
> Some background...
>
> I took the lab exam in San Jose and failed..Taking it in RTP on March 30th
> and 31st.
>
> 1. What are the most important benefits of this course?
A week of hands on without work interrupting. A few worthwhile tidbits.
>
> 2. Where did the course fall short of expectations?
You have a lab partner, which could be a real detriment depending on his/her
skills. Covered a lot of topics, all very shallow. Bruce tells you that his
course is NOT enough to pass and he is RIGHT. You must be prepared before you
arrive or the class will not be as useful.
>
> 3. Which areas of the lab examination does the course address very
> effectively?
ATM is great. Since this is new in the lab, the depth is not as great as older
technologies. BGP was also at the right level.
>
> 4. Which areas of the lab exam does the course not address too effectively?
No X.25. No voice (heard rumors that it's coming). No depth in any area
(biggest problem, but I don't know how to address - you only have a week).
>
>
>
> I was also wondering if anybody is using the "CCIE practice lab scenarios"
> from CCIEBOOTCAMP.. I think it is 500 or 600 bucks.
> What is your opinion on this?
Never did them.
>
>
> Thanks for your time,
> Sanjay
Joel
>
>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Dave Gahm [mailto:gahm@gci.net]
>> Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2000 12:54 PM
>> To: CCIE Lab Study Group
>> Subject: ANEW2
>>
>> I am scheduled to take the ANEW2 course from Geotrain. Anyone know how this
>> compares to the ECP class from Chesapeake?
>>
>> Thanks, Dave
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:22:52 GMT-3