From: Brad Hedlund (BHedlund@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Jan 27 2000 - 16:16:06 GMT-3
I'll take a shot at this....
access-list 90 permit 135.157.63.0 0.229.255.255
access-list 91 permit 156.35.1.0 0.0.254.255
How did I do?
-Brad
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brett Summerville [mailto:phreeze@erols.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2000 12:50 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Access lists...
>
>
>
> Configure an access-list to only allow networks with these
> sources: (Use as
> few of lines as possible)
>
> Source 135.157.63.X and source 135.135.63.X
>
> Deny all networks that have an odd subnet in following example:
>
> 156.35.X.Y where X is the subnet.
>
> TIA
>
> Brett
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Mosley, Arthur <Arthur.Mosley@wang.com>
> To: <pkm@calweb.com>; 'Tony Jackson ' <tjackso@lucent.com>
> Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2000 12:19 PM
> Subject: RE: Cisco Routers for Bridging, DLSW+ & Desktop Protocols
>
>
> > Every book has errors. This one has fewer than most. The
> quality of the
> > McGraw-Hill Technical Expert book series for Cisco is
> probably the best
> > around. Even the Caslow class includes a book from the
> series as required
> > reading(Advanced Ip Routing in Cisco Networks by Terry
> Slatery(CCIE#1026)and
> > Bill Burton (CCIE#1119). Moreover, I highly recommend
> every book in the
> > series and I not even a stock holder.
> >
> > art
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: pkm@calweb.com
> > To: Tony Jackson
> > Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Sent: 1/25/00 6:44 PM
> > Subject: Re: Cisco Routers for Bridging, DLSW+ & Desktop Protocols
> >
> > Tony Jackson wrote:
> > >
> > > Doesn't sound like a good book to me. You praised the book in the
> > first
> > > paragraph then in the second paragraph you list all of
> these mistakes.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> > Of
> > > pkm@calweb.com
> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2000 2:30 PM
> > > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Cc: pmoulay@ens.com
> > > Subject: Cisco Routers for Bridging, DLSW+ &
> Desktop Protocols
> > >
> > > Dear Members,
> > >
> > > I bought this book because I was weak on Desktop
> protocols and DLSW.
> > It
> > > complements the Caslow book admirably.
> > > IPX always is on the lab (5 points) as well as DLSW (5
> points). This
> > > book particularly explains how to configure IPX, IPX
> EIGRP and AT, AT
> > > EIGRP very well as well DECNET, VINES. I particularly
> appreciated the
> > > frame-relay and ISDN examples for each of the protocols.
> It is worth
> > the
> > > $55.
> > >
> > > I do have couple questions about some of the examples in
> this book:
> > >
> > > 1) p228-p229 example about HDLC config. I do not see a clock rate
> > > command. Is it a mistake or an oversight. I thought you need one
> > router
> > > to act as a DTE and the other one as a DCE?
> > > ALL the HDLC examples in this book do not use this.
> > >
> > > 2) Caslow book mentions the fact that when configuring EIGRP for
> > > appletalk
> > > the statement appletalk routing eigrp process-id
> > > automatically insert the command
> > > appletalk route-redistribution
> > > it is not true. I tried it. You have to add it manually.
> > >
> > > 3) this book disable split horizon on all the routers for
> IPX EIGRP
> > and
> > > AT EIGRP/RTMP for performance reasons-
> > > the author says "with NBMA networks, like Frame-relay or X.25,
> > > situations can arise where this behavior is suboptimal". I do not
> > agree
> > > with the author (but I am no CCIE!!!) - in a NBMA hub and spoke
> > topology
> > > (like advised by Caslow) - disable it on the hub router
> only - I agree
> > > with Caslow.
> > >
> > > 4) Be careful, when you configure zones and each the router are
> > attached
> > > to the same switch- the zone names need to be the same. Solution:
> > create
> > > a VLAN on the CAT5000 per Zone. A zone in AT language is
> definitely a
> > > VLAN!!!
> > >
> > > 5) When configuring EIGRP/IPX or EIGRP/AT in a all frame-relay
> > physical
> > > interfaces, I obtained spoke-to-spoke reachability
> without configurign
> > > any frame-relay map statements. Why? I had to do for IP.
> > >
> > > If anyone is interested I got working configs.
> > >
> > > Sincerely,
> > >
> > > Phillip Moulay
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:22:46 GMT-3